Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 10:40

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Apple Now Selling Refurbished M4 MacBook Air Models - MacRumors
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Zika Virus Is Back After 6 Years in One of the Most Popular U.S. Tourist Destinations - AOL.com
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What was the craziest place that you had sex with someone in public?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
US won't label China a currency manipulator amid tariff war - AP News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Long-dead NASA satellite suddenly emits massive radio burst - Chron
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.